Santa Clara MBA Lecture on Product Mgmt

Prof. Kumar Sarangee of Santa Clara’s Leavey School of Business invited Rich Mironov for a guest lecture on Product Market Planning and Strategy class.  This talk included a quick overview of what product managers are (what they do), how this fits into the overall business of creating technology, and how to think about pricing software and roadmapping. Continue reading

Very simple customer savings/ROI template

One of the first things I ask about with a new product team is “how will a customer justify paying for your product?”

An apparently simple question, but I often get blank stares.  Here’s a thumbnail of the problem and the process, along with a tiny spreadsheet template.

Problem

Your intended buyer isn’t the CEO, but instead some line employee or manager.  Every sizeable purchase order has to be explained and justified and “ROI’d”.  If you don’t help your intended buyer explain the specific savings that come from buying your product, it’s much harder to get a purchase approved.  So part of your ‘sales enablement’ job is to give the buyer (the customer) a simple tool to quantify savings.  In this situation, only numbers and dollars count – you’re not allowed to justify purchases based on ‘strategic value’ or vague improvement or handwaving.

Logic

Starting from the customer’s point of view, you have to show current costs and how your product/service will save the customer money.  Or, alternately, how you will help the customer make more money.  All of the logic and numbers are from the customer’s side: costs, quantities, numbers of transactions, percent improvement, etc.  Savings must be COMPUTED from these inputs in a simple way that the buyer’s CFO would understand.  For instance:

  • “Our super-special credit scoring application will reduce the number of outside credit checks you have to run.  You currently do {insert number} credit checks per year at {insert price}.  We’ll reduce that by {insert percentage} for a savings of {compute here}.  We will only charge you {insert price} for a net savings of {compute dollars} and ROI of {percent}.”
  • “Our super-special cell phone gaskets protect cell phones from damage when your subscribers drop them into puddles or mugs of beer.  You currently replace {percent} of subscriber cell phones every year for water damage, each of which costs you {dollars} in parts and support and shipping and wasted time.  Using our gaskets, you’ll reduce this by {percent} or {total number per year} for a savings of {dollars}.  Gaskets only add {our price per widget} to the phone cost, which is an overall savings of {compute dollars} and ROI of {percent}.”

You get the idea.  The details vary, but the approach does not.

I’ve uploaded a template for this.  It’s completely generic.  Some tips:

  • You’ll need to add your own savings logic as above.  Every savings story sounds similar, but the details are specific to your product/service.
  • I’ve marked all inputs (entry items) in bold blue italics with colored borders. That makes it easy for a user (customer) to know which are the inputs.  Likewise, I’ve ‘protected’ all of the cells that are not inputs.  You will need to turn on ‘sheet protection’ to see this work.  I’ve left ‘protect’ turned off, since the first thing you’ll probably want to do is edit this worksheet.
  • Keep things simple.  If you can reduce yours down to only a handful of rows, it is more powerful.  Make two versions if necessary.  Don’t have branching logic or super-fancy math that you’ll be endlessly explaining to sales reps with ADD.

Go get ‘em!

Site Licenses and Other Real-World Intrusions

We recently finished a major pricing exercise with a start-up in the enterprise software space: tuning up their prices, improving their upgrade model, and looking at alternative pricing metrics (i.e. what to meter when quantifying the customer’s usage).  A great opportunity to match quantitative models against actual customer behaviors.

During the engagement, the client’s sales team identified some real-world messiness that we (as product managers) would prefer to ignore: high-end customers who demand enterprise-wide licenses – instead of limited-use licenses tied to volume.  These are sometimes called “all you can eat” or AYCE deals.  Let’s describe the situation, then explore a few of the messy conclusions. Continue reading

Disruptive Pricing Units

During a miserable week of domestic air travel during June, I noticed new fees suddenly appearing for checked baggage and in-flight soft drinks.  That caused an announcement about a new airline to catch my eye – an airline offering a radically different approach to pricing.  It re-raised a topic that we explore with many clients: shifting the basis of competition by changing pricing units.

Derrie AirOn June 6th, a new airline called Derrie-Air started advertising fares based on total passenger weight,  with the slogan “Pack Less. Weigh Less. Pay Less.”  A flight from Philadelphia to Los Angeles was priced at $2.25 per pound – with each passenger paying based on body weight plus luggage.  Thus a supermodel carrying only a fashion tote could get to LaLaLand for $210 while Big Uncle Ralph and his steamer trunk would be $830. Continue reading

Risk-Sharing and Customer-Perceived Value

customer risk-takingWhenever customers buy your product or service, there’s a leap of faith that they will get value from you.  An alternative is to offer your solution in return for some of the savings — and to measure this in the customer’s own business units.  Even if you fall back on traditional pricing, it will help the customer assign real value to what you deliver. Continue reading

Sales-Friendly Price Lists

Price lists are never quite current enough, sufficiently detailed, or cover enough of the awkward special situations that customers raise.  So, there’s a tendency for HQ product and pricing folks to do a lot of tinkering on the margins with their price lists. We may be forgetting the “consumers” of price lists, though: sales reps who pay our salaries and customers wondering what to buy. Complicated pricing models may be self-defeating. Continue reading

"Goldilocks" Packaging

Established companies in established markets generally have some standard ways to package and price their new offerings. Product extensions are benchmarked against the existing product line or the other guy’s features and prices.  This leaves product managers focusing on “faster, cheaper, better, more.”

GoldilocksIn a brand-new market, though, there are fewer guideposts.  Close competitors may not exist.  Even before final products are ready, you need to define initial packaging and pricing for your fledgling sales force and prospects.  Otherwise, the sales team will invent it haphazardly, one visit at a time.  Here’s a starter approach that I’ve called “Goldilocks” packaging. Continue reading